International Science Editing

International Science Editing
Providers of Premier Scientific Editing Services
We speak your language
International Science Editing Portuguese website International Science Editing Japanese website International Science Editing Chinese website
  • Home
  • Services
    • Editing Services
      • Standard Editing
      • Premium Editing Service
      • Multiservice Package
    • Submission Support Services
      • Graphing
      • Custom Illustration
      • Figure Formatting
      • Journal Specific Formatting
      • Manuscript Review
      • Response to Reviewers
      • Multiservice Package
      • Cover Letter Writing
      • Lay Summary
    • Translation
    • Promote Your Research
  • Create Your Order
    • Editing
    • Submission Support Services
      • Manuscript Review Service
      • Figure Formatting
      • Custom Illustrations
      • Graphing
      • Video Abstracts and Video Bytes
      • Journal Specific Formatting
      • Multiservice Package
      • Response to Reviewers
      • Cover Letter Writing
      • Lay Summary
    • Translation
    • Promote Your Research
  • Payment
  • Writing Tips
    • Latest Posts
    • Manuscript Preparation
    • Journal Selection
    • Peer-Review
    • Publication Ethics
    • Research Promotion
    • Submitting an Article
    • Abstracts
    • Cover Letters
    • Request for Revision
  • Customer Service
    • FAQs
    • Feedback from our Clients
    • Approved Provider of Editing Services
    • Terms of Service
      • Security Policy
      • Privacy Policy
      • Cookie Policy
      • Disclaimer
  • 访问我们的中文网页
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • How Our Service Works
    • Publishers
    • Approved Provider of Editing Services
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives / “We are studying a narrow field and we disagree with previous research results. How can we report this?”

January 13, 2021 by Lisa Clancy

“We are studying a narrow field and we disagree with previous research results. How can we report this?”

This question was asked in the Q&A session of an online talk presented by International Science Editing. In this blog, we discuss how to respectfully dispute the findings of others.

Acknowledge the good

Begin by acknowledging what you liked. Rarely is a paper so poorly written that you cannot find a single aspect to commend.

This is a valuable result because …

Their trial was exceptionally laudable …

We applaud the authors for drawing attention to this topic …

We recognise the value of testing …

We would like to thank Smith et al. for their scientific contribution …

Use neutral language

Neutral language is not biased or overly critical. Use phrases like “our results indicate, or demonstrate” rather than “our results prove, or disprove”.

These results are inconsistent with the findings of Smith et al.

We respectfully disagree with their assertions and have detailed our reasoning below based on a critical evaluation of the published data and methods.

Although we agree that X, we believe there is insufficient evidence to support Y.

Argue both sides

Anticipate the authors’ response. By considering all potential opposing arguments, you will strengthen your own argument. Identify and address all sources that conflict with your argument. This will show the reader that you have considered your position from all angles.

Proponents of X often cite the well-known study by Smith et al. However, as discussed by Jones et al., this study had numerous limitations that are frequently overlooked.

However, a recent study by Smith et al. supports our theory, casting doubt on the conclusions of Jones et al.

Use quotations

A direct quote is often the fairest way to present the findings of others. It reduces the risk that you will present an opposing argument in a way that is biased towards your own interpretation.

However, the premise of the study, that V4 neurons “are generally not selective for direction of motion”, is not entirely accurate. At least three reports have assessed direction selectivity in V4 quantitatively and have found that … [read the findings].

This is especially important in the social sciences.

Kauffman writes that ‘inclusion’ is “virtually meaningless, a catchword used to give a patina of legitimacy to whatever program people are trying to sell or defend” [read more from Kauffman]. However, we are of the opinion …

Write as if you are on the same team

The group with whom you disagree likely want the same outcome as you—to get to the truth of the issue you are addressing. If you keep this in mind when drafting your paper, it will come across in your writing.

We cannot explain these inconsistencies. We suspect they are due to differences in X. Further studies are required to confirm Y.

This was surprising in light of a previous study that showed …

Perhaps a framework to enhance the interpretation of evidence should be developed.

Do not get personal

Focus on the facts, not the people. Avoid dismissive language such as:

Smith et al. naively argue that …

The authors clearly have not even read the article.

The authors display their lack of knowledge here by suggesting …

Avoid “straw man” arguments

Do not over-simplify or exaggerate the points made by the other authors, take their point out of context, or only focus on specific aspects while ignoring others—this is known as a straw man argument and is considered a deplorable way of refuting previous findings.

By way of example, a climate sceptic may offer the straw man argument that a specific finding (e.g., a temporary dip in sea levels) is evidence that the planet is not warming.

Conclusion

Disputes in science are common and necessary, and discussing your findings in the context of other evidence is the cornerstone of good science. Respectfully refuting previous results using clear reasoning will push your field forward.

Filed Under: Archives, Latest Posts, Manuscript Preparation Tagged With: disagree with results, respectfully disagree, science argument, science disagreement, science dispute

Chinese website

访问我们的中文网页

我们会将您的手稿交给与您所在研究领域相匹配的英语母语学术编辑进行润色,他们将修正拼写,语法,标点和句法错误。 编辑还将改进句子结构,并确保使用符合科学论文写作的专业用语。

Trusted by Publishers and Societies

  • Society of Child Development
  • SAE International
  • American Society of Hematology
  • American Association for Nutrition
  • American Meteorological Society
  • American Society for Microbology
  • American Association for Mechanical Engineering
  • American Society of Civil Engineers
  • American Psychological Association
  • Association for Computing Machinery
  • American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
  • American Society of Cancer Research

Price Calculator

Hands pulling rope playing tug of war, people competitive, dispute, contest concept.

“We are studying a narrow field and we disagree with previous research results. How can we report this?”

This question was asked in the Q&A session of an online talk presented by International Science Editing. In this blog, we discuss how to respectfully dispute the findings of others. Acknowledge the good Begin by acknowledging what you liked. Rarely is a paper so poorly written that you cannot find a single aspect to commend. […]

Currency converter

European Office

Tel: +353 61 472818
International Science Editing
Compuscript Ltd,
Shannon Industrial Estate West,
Shannon, Republic of Ireland.

Chinese Office

Tel: 0512-67621565, 0512-87661520
International Science Editing
Room 2013, Locca Tower,
8th Jiarui Road,
Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou,
Jiangsu Province, China.
访问我们的中文网页

North American Office

Tel: 717-668-9325
International Science Editing
2930 Legacy Lane,
York,
Pennsylvania, 17402,
U.S.A.

Copyright © 2025 · INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE EDITING · ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Real Time Web Analytics
We’ve updated our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. These updates address new privacy regulations in Europe and apply to everyone who uses International Science Editing including clients, authors and partners.
Click on Settings to view the list of cookies, the different category headings, and/or change the default settings. Please click on “Accept” to continue to use International Science Editing Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

These cookies do not store any directly identifiable information. However, they are necessary for the Service to function. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in, or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but without these cookies, some or all of the services you have asked for may not work properly.

Analytics

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Uncategorized

Undefined cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.

Performance

These are analytics and research cookies that allow us to count visits and measure traffic, so we can measure and improve the performance of our Services. They also help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site(s) or application(s). This helps us to improve the way our Services work and improve user experience. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies. Blocking these cookies will not affect the service provided to you.

Preferences

Preference cookies are used to store user preferences to provide content that is customized and convenient for the users, like the language of the website or the location of the visitor.

Targeting

These files, or code may be included, either directly or from our advertising partners, on our website, in our emails, or mobile applications to record how you interact with us, to help us better analyse and improve our services to you, and will use this information to make the website, and, any advertising displayed to you more relevant to your interests. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies. Blocking these cookies will not affect the service provided to you but will limit the targeted advertising that you will see or limit our ability to tailor the website experience to your needs.

Save & Accept