International Science Editing

International Science Editing
Providers of Premier Scientific Editing Services
We speak your language
International Science Editing Portuguese website International Science Editing Japanese website International Science Editing Chinese website
  • Home
  • Services
    • Editing Services
      • Standard Editing
      • Premium Editing Service
      • Multiservice Package
    • Submission Support Services
      • Graphing
      • Custom Illustration
      • Figure Formatting
      • Journal Specific Formatting
      • Manuscript Review
      • Response to Reviewers
      • Multiservice Package
      • Cover Letter Writing
      • Lay Summary
    • Translation
    • Promote Your Research
  • Create Your Order
    • Editing
    • Submission Support Services
      • Manuscript Review Service
      • Figure Formatting
      • Custom Illustrations
      • Graphing
      • Video Abstracts and Video Bytes
      • Journal Specific Formatting
      • Multiservice Package
      • Response to Reviewers
      • Cover Letter Writing
      • Lay Summary
    • Translation
    • Promote Your Research
  • Payment
  • Writing Tips
    • Latest Posts
    • Manuscript Preparation
    • Journal Selection
    • Peer-Review
    • Publication Ethics
    • Research Promotion
    • Submitting an Article
    • Abstracts
    • Cover Letters
    • Request for Revision
  • Customer Service
    • FAQs
    • Feedback from our Clients
    • Approved Provider of Editing Services
    • Terms of Service
      • Security Policy
      • Privacy Policy
      • Cookie Policy
      • Disclaimer
  • 访问我们的中文网页
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • How Our Service Works
    • Publishers
    • Approved Provider of Editing Services
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives / “Reject with option to resubmit.” Why do editors choose this option?

December 4, 2020 by Lisa Clancy

“Reject with option to resubmit.” Why do editors choose this option?

An editorial decision of “reject with option to resubmit” is inherently confusing, for inexperienced and seasoned authors alike. Has the paper been rejected? Should you revise and resubmit? To complicate matters further, for those journals that offer this option, a “reject with option to resubmit” can have very different meanings. In this blog, we examine the meaning(s) of this editorial decision and discuss why it is used.

Meaning 1: (Serious) major revisions

If the editor asks you to respond to the reviewers’ comments and gives you a deadline for the resubmission, you can assume the editor means “revise and resubmit,” but your paper will be treated as a new submission. But why not just say this? An editor may use “reject with option to resubmit” to mean “revise and resubmit” for a number of reasons:

To emphasize that the revisions required are (seriously) major, going well beyond what would typically be associated with a “major revision.” The editor wants to make it clear that the authors need to write a new paper, not simply enhance the original one.

To make it easier to reject the paper if the revisions/rebuttal are not convincing

. The majority of “revise and resubmit” papers are eventually accepted. As commented on by Angela Cochran of the Scholarly Kitchen, “when editors, reviewers, and authors have put time into critiquing and improving a paper, it just seems downright unfair to reject the paper” [see Scholarly Kitchen article]. This results in editors somewhat reluctantly accepting papers that they consider only “passable” after many rounds of revision. Editors can avoid getting locked in such revision cycles with “reject with option to resubmit.”

To reduce pushback from authors

Authors receiving a “revise and resubmit” may be more likely to refute or ignore the editor’s comments. This can result in a long-drawn-out process that exhausts the authors, reviewers, and editor. “Reject with option to resubmit” indicates that ignored comments will likely be met with a rejection and any rebuttals must be concrete.

If the outcome of the revision is unpredictable. For example, the re-working may destroy the results and/or conclusions. If the editor cannot be sure that the recommended changes would bring the paper over the accept bar, they are likely to choose “reject with option to resubmit.”

To improve the journal’s submission-to-acceptance figures

This is a somewhat controversial point. Some scholars believe “reject with option to resubmit” is a sneaky way for journals to improve their statistics. The clock keeps ticking with “revise and resubmit” papers, often extending the submission-to-acceptance time by months. This is not the case for “reject with option to resubmit” papers [discussed Scientist Squirrel blog ]. This may the case for a small minority of journals; however, it is far more likely that journals use “reject with option to resubmit” for the reasons outlined above.

Meaning 2: The editor does not want to see your paper again.

If the editor does not ask you describe the changes that have been made to the original paper and does not provide a deadline for resubmission, they likely do not want to see your paper again (unless it is essentially unrecognizable from the original). Editors often use this approach if they liked the concept but thought the execution was irredeemably poor. Additionally, an editor may choose this option if they not want to discourage early-career authors.

If you receive a “reject with option to resubmit” and do not agree with the recommended changes, you are free to submit the original paper to another journal. However, this is not without risks, particularly for specialist topics that have a small pool of reviewers. It is not uncommon for reviewers to be sent the same paper by different journals. As one economics scholar commented, “I had two experiences with reject and resubmit … which ended up in a rejection. In both cases, the editor sent the paper to the same reviewers who had made [up] their minds already” [see EconJobRumors thread].

Conclusion

You may be disheartened to receive a “reject with option to resubmit.” However, remember it gives you a fighting chance. As one scholar commented on Twitter, “I’ve had a couple of papers where they rejected because of reviewer comments that I actually could address, but the editor may not have known I could address (e.g., with other data). Wish I’d have gotten a reject and resubmit” [see Jared Rubin tweet].

Filed Under: Archives, Latest Posts, Peer-Review Tagged With: major revision, peer-review, reject with option to resubmit, revise and resubmit

Chinese website

访问我们的中文网页

我们会将您的手稿交给与您所在研究领域相匹配的英语母语学术编辑进行润色,他们将修正拼写,语法,标点和句法错误。 编辑还将改进句子结构,并确保使用符合科学论文写作的专业用语。

Trusted by Publishers and Societies

  • Society of Child Development
  • SAE International
  • American Society of Hematology
  • American Association for Nutrition
  • American Meteorological Society
  • American Society for Microbology
  • American Association for Mechanical Engineering
  • American Society of Civil Engineers
  • American Psychological Association
  • Association for Computing Machinery
  • American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
  • American Society of Cancer Research

Price Calculator

"Right, wrong, it depends" - wooden signpost, cloudy sky

Declarative titles: Should you state a study’s main findings in the title?

There has been some controversy over the usage of declarative titles, i.e., titles that state the main findings of the study. e.g., Visible light reduces C. elegans longevity [1] Pros Defenders of such titles have argued that they are more informative than other title styles (for information on title styles, please refer to our blog […]

Currency converter

European Office

Tel: +353 61 472818
International Science Editing
Compuscript Ltd,
Shannon Industrial Estate West,
Shannon, Republic of Ireland.

Chinese Office

Tel: 0512-67621565, 0512-87661520
International Science Editing
Room 2013, Locca Tower,
8th Jiarui Road,
Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou,
Jiangsu Province, China.
访问我们的中文网页

North American Office

Tel: 717-668-9325
International Science Editing
2930 Legacy Lane,
York,
Pennsylvania, 17402,
U.S.A.

Copyright © 2025 · INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE EDITING · ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Real Time Web Analytics
We’ve updated our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. These updates address new privacy regulations in Europe and apply to everyone who uses International Science Editing including clients, authors and partners.
Click on Settings to view the list of cookies, the different category headings, and/or change the default settings. Please click on “Accept” to continue to use International Science Editing Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

These cookies do not store any directly identifiable information. However, they are necessary for the Service to function. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in, or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but without these cookies, some or all of the services you have asked for may not work properly.

Targeting

These files, or code may be included, either directly or from our advertising partners, on our website, in our emails, or mobile applications to record how you interact with us, to help us better analyse and improve our services to you, and will use this information to make the website, and, any advertising displayed to you more relevant to your interests. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies. Blocking these cookies will not affect the service provided to you but will limit the targeted advertising that you will see or limit our ability to tailor the website experience to your needs.

Analytics

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Uncategorized

Undefined cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.

Performance

These are analytics and research cookies that allow us to count visits and measure traffic, so we can measure and improve the performance of our Services. They also help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site(s) or application(s). This helps us to improve the way our Services work and improve user experience. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies. Blocking these cookies will not affect the service provided to you.

Preferences

Preference cookies are used to store user preferences to provide content that is customized and convenient for the users, like the language of the website or the location of the visitor.

Save & Accept